As mentioned earlier, generalization can be made about small grain varieties primarily developed for grain production. In the last 10 years or so, there have been varieties developed principally for forage. These varieties will produce substantially greater yields, but at the expense of quality. Much stemier and coarse, substantially lower gains can be expected. My experience with these varieties is limited, but I would not attempt to grow calves on these forage varieties without added grain or other high energy supplements. Actually, where small grain forage varieties are most suited is for finishing rations. In this case we are looking at silage primarily as a fiber source and the lower quality is not nearly so detrimental.

In summary, it can be said that small grain silages are an excellent albeit slightly lower quality alternative to corn silage. From a production standpoint the most important items to keep in mind are the more rapid maturity and the adverse affect delayed harvest can have on both the quality and packing characteristics.

Volume IX Number 3
May/June 2001

Research Discovers that Cattle Over



Take Advantage of Small Grain Silages

by Dr. David Porter Price

To most cattle feeders, the generic term silage refers to corn silage. But it is also possible to make good quality silage out of small grains. I have always been an advocate of small grain silages, not because there is any particular advantage over corn silage, but rather, small grains can be double cropped with corn, providing a winter or spring crop.

It used to be that generalizations could be made about small grain forages grown for silage. Indeed, that is still possible as long as we are referring to varieties primarily designed as grain crops. Whether the crop be barley, wheat, oats, or even triticale, put up correctly, they will be higher in protein, phosphorous, potassium and virtually all trace minerals than corn silage.

Small grain silages will also be slightly higher in fiber and significantly lower in energy. Without going through a lot of calculations, it can be said that small grain silages put up correctly will normally result in roughly 1/2 to 3/4 lbs./day less gain than good corn silage. In other words, good corn silage will typically result in gains of 1.75 to 2.25 lbs./day. Properly cut and ensiled, small grain silages will typically result in gains of about 1.5 to a maximum of about 1.75 lbs./day.

In actual practice, however, it must be pointed out that most small grain silages have grain added to them which boosts gains substantially. These figures are for silages with protein and mineral supplementation only. Indeed, it should be admonished that all silages require supplementation. Occasionally we see farmer feeders try to feed silages without protein or mineral supplementation, resulting in disappointing performance.

It should also be pointed out that harvesting times with small grain silages are much more critical than for corn silage. This is why the phrase, "properly cut and ensiled," was used as a disclaimer. Delayed harvesting or incomplete packing can result in an exceedingly poor quality feed.

With respect to harvesting, corn silage is relatively forgiving. Small grains are not. The reason is that when small grains begin to mature, lignification of the stalk occurs much more rapidly than corn. Lignon, of course, is a woody type of fiber that is virtually indigestible to the animal. With small grains, within 2 weeks the plant can go from a good quality forage to little more than straw.

University research has indicated that maximum yields will be obtained when small grains are cut at a mid-dough stage. However, if cut at the milk stage, reduction in yield is only about 10 percent. I therefore recommend to my clients to begin cutting at the milk stage. That way if there are any weather or mechanical problems that create harvesting delays, we have some breathing room.

In addition to the reduction in digestibility, increasing maturity of small grain forages increases packing difficulty exponentially. As a general rule small grains are much more "spongy" than corn silage and difficult to pack. When mature, it is virtually impossible to remove all the oxygen, and a dark, lower quality silage will be inevitable. This dark color not only indicates reduced energy, but denatured protein as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


To subscribe to Dr. Price's newsletter, call Feed*Lot at 800-798-9515.

 



All information is copywrited by Feed Lot magazine and cannot be printed or re-printed without the publishers express consent. Please contact Feed Lot Magazine for reprint and copy authorization.