![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Comments by James I. Sprague Livestock Nutritionist
True Genetic Feed Efficiency Can Be Attained What has happened is we get some apparent improvement in feed efficiency by selection for growth rate. Within breeds and types of cattle this selection for gain has indirectly improved efficiency, but there was probably no true genetic selection for feed efficiency. Therefore, the improvement in feed efficiency was apparent rather than real. But true genetic improvement can be achieved. Recent research by the Australian group (Arthur et. al 2001 J. Anim. Sci.79) have demonstrated that selection for feed efficiency can be attained without hurting other genetic traits.
Feed Efficiency and Profit Potential Feed conversion is the important way feedlots evaluate feeding programs. When this is combined with all costs, then the value becomes a means of evaluating the total feeding program as cost of gain. Cost of gain and then profit or loss per head give the final value of a pen of cattle. The question remains, since feedlot operators cannot purchase cattle with true genetic feed efficiency then what can we do? The answer is in the details of integrated management activities. The improvement can be found in: (1) animal health management, (2) finding and marketing efficient cattle, and (3) ration management.
Strategy No. 1: Find Healthy Cattle, Manage the Health Program
Strategy No. 2: Find and Market Efficient Cattle Find cattle that will gain weight. This is usually correlated with feed efficiency.
Manage the purchase and selling shrink. Cattle feeders know that purchasing a pen of cattle often times comes down to the weighing conditions (extra fill or shrink). This can amount to several pounds that have to be made up if excess fill is not controlled. Price and weighing conditions are fundamental for a good performing pen. The timing of shipping on a pen of cattle also can effect the close-out and feed efficiency. Weather conditions can severely effect the feed and water fill of the livestock. It is possible to have a shrink of 20 pounds per head from lack of feed and 40 pounds from lack of water. If cattle are marketed on a carcass basis this is not as important for the profit or loss of a pen, but the close-out calculation is usually made on the live weight shipped and a high shipping shrink affects the calculation of feed efficiency. Sort off and market the tail-enders ahead of the main marketing of the pen. Consider using ultrasound sorting of cattle for the proper time on feed and "value" marketing.
Strategy No. 3: Ration Management Adds to Efficiency
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
All information is copywrited by Feed Lot magazine and cannot be printed or re-printed
without the publishers express consent. Please contact
Feed Lot Magazine for reprint and copy authorization.
|
||||