![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Once again, Senator Edward Kennedy, (D-Mass.) has introduced a bill to eliminate the use of some antibiotics in livestock. However, this year it's different. Senator Kennedy is joined by Senator Olympia Snow (R-Maine). This marks the first time the bill is sponsored by a republican. The proposed bill bans the use of eight antibiotics commonly used in agriculture to promote the growth of poultry and livestock, according to the Portland Press Herald. The bill was introduced at the end of July.
"Science-based regulatory efforts are far superior to this legislation." -
Coalition for Animal Health
A related
article in the Portland Press Herald says that the American Medical Association
has come out in support
of use restrictions. A study conducted
by the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine called for an end
to nontherapeutic use of the drugs, as did a 2002 study in the medical journal "Clinical
Infectious Diseases."
"The Kennedy-Snowe bill mirrors the political, not scientific, action taken by the European Union except that it goes beyond the Europeans by banning the use of antibiotics to prevent diseases. As a result of the removal of antibiotics for growth promotion in Europe, many European countries have documented a significant increase in animal disease and the use of antibiotics to treat that disease. Recently published literature shows resistance patterns in humans have rarely declined as a result of this action. Europe has jeopardized animal health and has not demonstrated an improvement in human health," says the CAH/NCBA statement. "Evidence demonstrates the care our members use in administering antibiotics to animals is working to protect public health, according to the statement. "The rate of resistant food borne bacteria in humans is dropping, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The incidence of bacteria on raw meat is declining, according to USDA. The rate of food borne illness in the United States is also dropping, according to CDC. "These accomplishments are the result of a science-based regulatory system that continues to improve and that we will continue to support," says the statement endorsed by the Coalition for Animal Health, American Feed Industry Association, American Veterinary Medical Association, Animal Health Institute, National Cattlemen's Beef Association, National Chicken Council, National Pork Producers Council, National Turkey Federation and United Egg Producers. The bill defines therapeutic use as, "The term `nontherapeutic use', with respect to a critical antimicrobial animal drug, means any use of the drug as a feed or water additive for an animal in the absence of any clinical sign of disease in the animal for growth promotion, feed efficiency, weight gain, routine disease prevention, or other routine purpose." The antibiotics that are included in the bill are "any kind of penicillin, tetracycline, bacitracin, macrolide, lincomycin, streptogramin, aminoglycoside, sulfonamide; or any other drug or derivative of a drug that is used in humans or intended for use in humans to treat or prevent disease or infection caused by microorganisms." A related article with Dr. Kenny Brock, DVM, MS, PhD, professor at Auburn University on the antibiotics issue is on the following page. Cattlemen need to become educated on this issue. Following label usage and withdrawal times on currently approved antibiotics helps ensure the quality of beef in the food chain. To see a copy of the bill, go to: http://thomas.loc.gov and search for "Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act of 2003." You can find the address for your senator at www.senate.gov. ©
| ||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
All information is copywrited by Feed Lot magazine and cannot be printed or re-printed
without the publishers express consent. Please contact
Feed Lot Magazine for reprint and copy authorization.
|
||||