Volume XI Number 5 September/October 2003
Home | Current Issue | Past Issue | Staff | Archives | Advertising | Links | Subscribe | Contact Us

Senate Bill Banning Certain Antibiotics Introduced



Once again, Senator Edward Kennedy, (D-Mass.) has introduced a bill to eliminate the use of some antibiotics in livestock. However, this year it's different. Senator Kennedy is joined by Senator Olympia Snow (R-Maine). This marks the first time the bill is sponsored by a republican. The proposed bill bans the use of eight antibiotics commonly used in agriculture to promote the growth of poultry and livestock, according to the Portland Press Herald. The bill was introduced at the end of July.

The Coalition for Animal Health, along with NCBA and several other livestock industry organizations, oppose legislative bans of important animal health products that have been approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration. In a joint statement, the organizations believe the bill introduced by Senators Kennedy and Snowe is even less appropriate now than when a similar bill was introduced last year.

According to the Coalition for Animal Health (CAH) in the past year, FDA has introduced new requirements for animal drug sponsors to demonstrate that antibiotics used will not contribute to antibiotic resistance. This science-based risk assessment will be applied to all new and existing products, not just the few compounds singled out in this legislation. USDA also has initiated a new program to produce meaningful data on the relationship between antibiotic use and antibiotic resistant bacteria on raw meat. This data will be important in helping our members make even better management decisions about the use of antibiotics. Science-based regulatory efforts are far superior to this legislation in terms of protecting human health and avoiding unintended consequences.

"Science-based regulatory efforts are far superior to this legislation." - Coalition for Animal Health
A related article in the Portland Press Herald says that the American Medical Association has come out in support of use restrictions. A study conducted by the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine called for an end to nontherapeutic use of the drugs, as did a 2002 study in the medical journal "Clinical Infectious Diseases."

"The Kennedy-Snowe bill mirrors the political, not scientific, action taken by the European Union except that it goes beyond the Europeans by banning the use of antibiotics to prevent diseases. As a result of the removal of antibiotics for growth promotion in Europe, many European countries have documented a significant increase in animal disease and the use of antibiotics to treat that disease. Recently published literature shows resistance patterns in humans have rarely declined as a result of this action. Europe has jeopardized animal health and has not demonstrated an improvement in human health," says the CAH/NCBA statement.

"Evidence demonstrates the care our members use in administering antibiotics to animals is working to protect public health, according to the statement. "The rate of resistant food borne bacteria in humans is dropping, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The incidence of bacteria on raw meat is declining, according to USDA. The rate of food borne illness in the United States is also dropping, according to CDC.

"These accomplishments are the result of a science-based regulatory system that continues to improve and that we will continue to support," says the statement endorsed by the Coalition for Animal Health, American Feed Industry Association, American Veterinary Medical Association, Animal Health Institute, National Cattlemen's Beef Association, National Chicken Council, National Pork Producers Council, National Turkey Federation and United Egg Producers.

The bill defines therapeutic use as, "The term `nontherapeutic use', with respect to a critical antimicrobial animal drug, means any use of the drug as a feed or water additive for an animal in the absence of any clinical sign of disease in the animal for growth promotion, feed efficiency, weight gain, routine disease prevention, or other routine purpose."

The antibiotics that are included in the bill are "any kind of penicillin, tetracycline, bacitracin, macrolide, lincomycin, streptogramin, aminoglycoside, sulfonamide; or any other drug or derivative of a drug that is used in humans or intended for use in humans to treat or prevent disease or infection caused by microorganisms."

A related article with Dr. Kenny Brock, DVM, MS, PhD, professor at Auburn University on the antibiotics issue is on the following page. Cattlemen need to become educated on this issue. Following label usage and withdrawal times on currently approved antibiotics helps ensure the quality of beef in the food chain.

To see a copy of the bill, go to: http://thomas.loc.gov and search for "Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act of 2003." You can find the address for your senator at www.senate.gov. ©


Home | Current Issue | Past Issue | Staff | Archives | Advertising | Links | Subscribe | Contact Us

All information is copywrited by Feed Lot magazine and cannot be printed or re-printed without the publishers express consent. Please contact Feed Lot Magazine for reprint and copy authorization.