Volume XIII Number 2
March/April 2005
Home | Current Issue | Past Issue | Staff | Archives | Advertising | Links | Subscribe | Contact Us

Strong Beef Demand Growth During 2004, But Growth Could Slow This Year


by James Mintert, Ph.D., Agricultural Economist, Kansas State University

U.S. consumer demand for beef rose again during 2004. This past year’s increase in Choice retail beef demand was the largest increase since beef demand started to rebound in the late 1990’s. Since 1998, when domestic beef demand bottomed out, Choice retail beef demand has increased approximately 25 percent. Looking ahead, domestic demand growth is likely to slow during 2005.

Fortunately for U.S. beef producers, U.S. consumers did not back away from beef following discovery of a single BSE case in late 2003. In fact, strong domestic beef demand, particularly during the first half of 2004, helped the beef industry weather the dramatic decline in export demand that occurred during 2004. Per capita retail beef consumption in the U.S. during 2004 totaled 66.1 pounds, an increase of 1.8 percent compared to 2003. The consumption increase occurred despite the fact that domestic beef production declined 6.4 percent from the prior year. The primary reason that domestic consumption increased at the same time that production declined was that U.S. beef exports during 2004 fell 82 percent below 2003’s and beef imports rose 22 percent. Part of the increase in imports came about because Canada was able to export boxed beef from animals less than 30 months of age to the U.S. throughout 2004, compared to partial access during 2003. Despite the modest rise in beef supplies facing U.S. consumers, the inflation adjusted price of Choice retail beef during 2004 was 5.7 percent higher than 2003’s. Since domestic consumers ate more beef and were willing to pay a higher price for the larger quantity, it means domestic beef demand increased compared to 2003. Beef demand index calculations indicate U.S. beef demand during 2004 increased 7.6 percent above 2003’s.

Beef demand growth was strongest during the first three quarters 2004. During the first three quarters of 2004 domestic retail Choice beef demand increased 10.9%, 9.3%, and 8.9%, respectively, compared to 2003. The strong year-to-year demand growth during the first nine months of 2004 was a continuation of the extraordinary demand growth that took place during the last six months of 2003. It’s difficult to sustain dramatic demand growth like that observed during late 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004. Sure enough, domestic beef demand growth slowed appreciably during the fall.

Domestic beef supplies increased markedly during fall 2004 compared to fall 2003. Per capita beef supplies totaled 16.3 pounds during the fall, 9% larger than a year earlier. The large increase in supplies pushed inflation adjusted Choice retail prices below the prior year by 5.9 percent. Although significant, the price decline was less than expected with stable beef demand, given the large supply increase. As a result, domestic beef demand was stronger during fall 2004 than during fall 2003, but the increase was small compared to the five previous quarters. Beef demand index calculations reveal that demand growth during the fall quarter slowed to 1.8 percent.

Improvements in domestic beef demand since the late 1990’s are attributable to several factors. Growth in consumers’ incomes, introduction of new, high quality beef products that meet the needs of time strapped consumers, and reduced emphasis on negative health information as it relates to beef consumption all played a role. But it’s become increasingly clear that consumer interest in low carbohydrate diets also provided a welcome boost to beef demand in recent years. Some survey data suggests that interest in low carbohydrate diets has peaked and is actually starting to wane. The slowdown in beef demand growth during fall 2004 is consistent with the notion that interest in low carbohydrate diets has peaked. Looking ahead to 2005, it seems likely that domestic beef demand gains will be far more modest than the robust increases observed in late 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004.©

 
Home | Current Issue | Past Issue | Staff | Archives | Advertising | Links | Subscribe | Contact Us

All information is copywrited by Feed Lot magazine and cannot be printed or re-printed without the publishers express consent. Please contact Feed Lot Magazine for reprint and copy authorization.