Volume XIII Number 4
August 2005
Home | Current Issue | Past Issue | Staff | Archives | Advertising | Links | Subscribe | Contact Us

Feedlots Learn to Use Optaflexx


One of the questions asked when Optaflexx was first offered, could feedlots work it into their programs? Since it is fed only for a short period of time, 28 to 42 days, the Optaflexx feed additive required special rations and care in the execution of the rations at a very critical time in the feeding program.

One of the things reported to Feed•Lot magazine by feedlot nutritionists is, “Feedlots have learned to execute the program.” Other nutritionist report the most convenient way to get the feed additive into the finish ration is with the “micro-nutrient” machines that are used at medium and larger feedlots. Another nutritionist said he suggests his clients consider feeding Optaflexx since it will usually pay a return for the investment in the additive. But he said that he reminds his clients the return is not as great as Rumensin or implants.

Latest large pen research positive

Elanco has undertaken follow-up research supervised by independent researchers at the agriculture colleges and independent consultants. For example, the Journal of Animal Science, Midwest Section (2005) reported a study of 2015 steers fed at Larned, Kansas. Rumensin and Tylan were fed with the Optaflexx at 200 mg per day. Results as reported in the abstract report, “Feeding Optaflexx at 200 mg per head for 29 days prior to slaughter improved live weight gain 16 percent and hot carcass gain by 17 percent with out affecting quality grade.”

Elanco’s post-registration studies positive
The Elanco team has provided results for their post-registration trials. These trials included Rumensin and Tylan in the feeding program plus implants were also used (Laudert, et al. 2004. Optaflexx Exchange #4, Elanco Animal Health A19725). The six trials demonstrated a significant advantage of 14.8 lb live weight a 12.3 lb carcass increase for the 200 mg per day of Optaflexx. However, as expected some trials gave more response than others. For example the increase in carcass weight increased from 6.4 to 17.8, but all the responses were positive.

“What we know”
At the Plains Nutrition Council 2005 Spring Conference, Dr. Robbi Pritchard discussed “what we know about Optaflexx and what we would like to know.” Dr. Pritchard is a professor at South Dakota State University. He explained what we know is the mode of action of this product, that we can expect a ‘biologically and economically improvement in cumulative average daily gain and feed/gain even in cattle fed for 150 days.” He further added that what we know about the mode of action of implants and adrenergic agonists could be interpreted to expect them to be additive in growth promotion.

What we would like to know
Pritchard raised several questions at the conference. “Is there a break point between 28 and 42 days to achieve maximum growth and carcass weight?” He suggested that possibly heifers and calves will need 300 mg rather than 200 mg: “In these types of cattle can more days at 200 mg/day achieve the same results as 300 mg/day for fewer days?”

He indicated a more immediate need is the tolerance response for big and light intake pens. For example, if a batch is formulated for 21 lb of intake, then a pen with low intake versus a pen at high intake will have a large variation in the dose of Optaflexx. Will we have to fine tune our feeding program for extra small or large intakes from our average pen? Feedlots like to make large batches for several pens.
He also asks, “Is there a point where the product will not be cost effective in lower intake, lower performance cattle.”

Ration formulation
Up to now, the recommendations are for high energy /adequate protein finishing rations. However several feedlot nutritionists, have asked is there a caution for very low protein finishing rations when Optaflexx is used. Some feeders may be using a ration as high as 16 percent crude protein with co-products and while other feedlots may be using rations as low as 11 percent protein if the grain may be low in protein content. We know from swine research that the extra protein or increased essential amino acids are needed when feeding this additive. ©

Comments on this or any article by Dr. Sprague can be addressed to him at 625 Grandview, Newton, KS 67114, or call (316) 283-8692.

 
Home | Current Issue | Past Issue | Staff | Archives | Advertising | Links | Subscribe | Contact Us

All information is copywrited by Feed Lot magazine and cannot be printed or re-printed without the publishers express consent. Please contact Feed Lot Magazine for reprint and copy authorization.